"We want Perp Walks! We want transparency and accountability. If we don't get arrests, like the United Kingdom arrested Andew, then, we won't vote for Trump and we want Pam Bondi fired!" Sure the economy is improving, thanks to Bondi and the DOJ journalist Don Lemon was indicted for invading a faith service to protest U. S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE). speaking of ICE, we have according to the Brookings Institution estimated around 310,000 deported and 210,000 to 405,000 voluntary departures due to enforcement activity despite federal Court activism but suddenly dump Trump and Bondi! Stand in line for a face slap. You have walked into the trap set by the "perverse" Democrat Party, giving them moral high ground when Democrats have been more greatly impacted by the Epstein Files.
But Andrew, Lord Mountbatten-Windsor, was arrested by King Charles of the United Kingdom, Ken!
Andrew was not arrested for the affairs he had with any teen girl or boy. He was arrested by British police on February 19, 2026, on suspicion of misconduct in public office. The investigation relates to allegations that he shared confidential government information with convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein while serving as a UK trade envoy. He was released under investigation. According to SkyNews, "Misconduct in public office refers to "serious wilful abuse or neglect" of powers relating to the role in public office, according to the Crown Prosecution Service (CPS)." SkyNews continues, "The CPS website states there is no simple definition of a 'public officer', meaning each case must be assessed individually. This includes taking into account the nature of the role, the duties carried out, and the level of public trust involved.
The British Monarchy acts as a public institution in a non-political sense, with members of the Royal Family expected to support the monarch while also carrying out work in areas of public and charitable service in their own right.
Andrew also served as the UK's trade envoy between 2001 and 2011, a role which aims to try to advance the interests of British business owners overseas."
He stepped down in 2011 after coming under fire over his association with convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein.
Andy Verity of the BBC in "Andrew shared confidential information with Epstein as trade envoy, files suggest" writes, "Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor appears to have knowingly shared confidential information with Jeffrey Epstein from his official work as trade envoy in 2010 and 2011, according to material in the latest release of files in the US seen by the BBC.
Emails from the recently-released batch of Epstein files show the former prince passing on reports of visits to Singapore, Hong Kong and Vietnam and confidential details of investment opportunities.
Under official guidance, trade envoys have a duty of confidentiality over sensitive, commercial, or political information about their official visits."
The U.S. statute of limitations for sharing secrets illegally depends on the nature of the information. Civil, trade secret misappropriation (under DTSA or UTSA) generally allows 3 years to file suit after discovery. Criminal theft of trade secrets usually has a 5-year limit, while espionage and related violations can have up to 10-year limits, per federal law. It is determined by the nature of the allegations. For example, the statute of limitations for statutory rape is 1 year for a misdemeanor and 3 years for a felony. On the other hand, for sexual acts with a child under 10, prosecutors may file a case at any time after the offense has been committed.
On November 18, 2025, the U.S. House of Representatives voted against a resolution to censure Delegate Stacey Plaskett (D-Virgin Islands) for her text message exchange with convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein during a 2019 congressional hearing.
The measure, introduced by Rep. Ralph Norman (R-S.C.), failed in a 209-214 vote, falling along largely party-line, despite three Republicans voting against the censure and three others voting "present".
People Entertainment's Paloma Chavez in "Whoopi Goldberg Denies Ties to Jeffrey Epstein After Her Name Surfaces in Files: ‘I Wasn’t His Girlfriend, I Wasn’t His Friend’" writes, "Whoopi Goldberg has addressed her name being found in the Epstein files, insisting it doesn’t mean she’s guilty of any wrongdoing." Golberg is quoted, "You used to have to have facts before you said stuff.” Despite Goldberg's explanations, the episode faced immediate criticism online. Commentators pointed out the irony in how the show has previously called out public figures for their Epstein connections but appeared to be downplaying Goldberg's involvement. Conservative commentators highlighted her past urgings for transparency while now seeking to minimize her association. Hey, Whoopie and MAGA, there is a great dispairity between perception and reality. While Goldberg defended her position, this incident underscores the complexity of public figures' relationships and how they navigate controversy.
MAGA, stop awaiting the courts of law to give you the desired satisfaction you desire. Stop weighing your anger and dissatisfaction in the scales of justice that is handcuffed by statutes of limitations and the limits of justicce. It is now time for you to wisely use the courts of public opinion to bring about the justice you seek. The Democrats hoped your ignorance of law would give them the "moral authority" to prosecute the Epstein File without the power of true justice. This is the "hoax" referred to by President Trump. The White House in "Where Is Democrats’ Transparency on Epstein?" writes, "As President Donald J. Trump said, “House Republicans should vote to release the Epstein files, because we have nothing to hide, and it’s time to move on from this Democrat Hoax perpetrated by Radical Left Lunatics in order to deflect from the Great Success of the Republican Party.”
Why haven’t Democrats shown the same transparency — and what else are they hiding?
Why aren’t Democrats talking about the fact that Del. Stacey Plaskett (D-U.S. Virgin Islands) solicited (and was given) $30,000 from Epstein for the DCCC after he was already a convicted sex offender? Or the fact that Plaskett herself accepted maxed out donations from Epstein for her own campaign? Or the fact that the wife of the former Democrat governor of the U.S. Virgin Islands told Epstein “we would have a friend in Stacey” if he made said donations? Or the fact that Plaskett was literally texting Epstein during a committee hearing?
Why aren’t Democrats talking about the fact that former President Bill Clinton traveled on Epstein’s aircraft 26 times? Or the fact that one of Epstein’s victims wrote that she saw Clinton on Epstein’s island with two young women? Or the fact that Clinton’s visit to the island was corroborated by one of his former top aides?
Why aren’t Democrats talking about the “long relationship” and storied friendship that Larry Summers — ex-Harvard President, Clinton Treasury Secretary, and prominent Democrat — had with Epstein, who described himself as Summers’ “wing man”?
Why aren’t Democrats talking about the fact that Democrat so-called “journalist” Katie Couric had dinner at Epstein’s residence after he was already a convicted sex offender who had served jail time?
Why aren’t Democrats talking about the fact that Reid Hoffman — billionaire Democrat megadonor — visited Epstein’s “pedophile island,” attended a dinner with him, and even planned to stay at his New York mansion?
Why aren’t Democrats talking about the fact that the Democrat National Committee refused to return $32,000 in donations from Epstein?
Why aren’t Democrats talking about the fact that Michael Wolff “encouraged Jeffrey Epstein to blackmail then-presidential candidate Donald Trump — insisting the convicted pedophile could generate a ‘debt’ from him”?
It’s time for Democrats to answer for their longstanding ties to Epstein. Then, we can get back to what matters to the American people."
It is the Democrats responsibility to hold themselves legally where possible, legislatively where possible, and economically where necessary in the Epstein Files.
The Republicans, United States Secretary of Homeland Security Kristi Noem, Speaker of the United States House of Representatives Mike Johnson, and Bondi must be transparent and hold accountable United States Representative Bennie Thompson, a member of the Democratic Party, who served as the Chair of the Committee on Homeland Security from 2007 to 2011 and from 2019 to 2023. Under his Chair Watch, 100,00's of unaccompanied minors entered the U.S. Apprehensions of unaccompanied minors (UAC) at the U.S. Southwest border have risen significantly over the past decade, peaking at over 149,000 in FY2022, with FY2024 seeing 87,475 in the first 10 months. Between Oct 2020 and Sept 2024, HHS cared for 468,736 migrant children. Most come from Central America (Guatemala, Honduras) and Mexico. The House Committee on Homeland Security in "“It’s a Pipeline”: Experts Reveal How Taxpayer-Funded NGOs Facilitated Human Trafficking, Profited from Biden-Harris Border Crisis" stated, "In the hearing, witnesses laid out in detail how NGOs received more than $6 billion from the Biden-Harris administration, including through grants from the Department of Homeland Security (DHS), the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), and others. They also testified about how the Biden-Harris administration handed over unaccompanied alien children (UACs) to NGOs, primarily at the border, who then delivered them to poorly-vetted sponsors. The Biden-Harris administration then failed to ensure proper follow-up communications to check on the well-being of the children, leading to more than 300,000 children unaccounted for in the interior. Simultaneously, many of these NGOs and their executives enjoyed substantial revenue and salary increases thanks to the grants." House Homeland Security in "TRAFFICKED, EXPLOITED, AND MISSING: MIGRANT CHILDREN VICTIMS OF THE BIDEN-HARRIS ADMINISTRATION" stated, "The purpose of this hearing is to examine how the Biden-Harris administration's crisis at the border has led to increased numbers of trafficked, missing, and exploited children." Laura Doan of CBS News in "Trump claims Biden lost track of over 300,000 migrant children. Here's a fact check." writes, "President-elect Donald Trump claimed in his Person of the Year interview with Time magazine this week that President Biden's administration lost track of more than 300,000 migrant children who crossed the border unaccompanied, saying many of them are in danger or dead. But experts say he's distorting the facts.
"We have 325,000 children here during Democrats — and this was done by Democrats — who are right now slaves, sex slaves or dead," Trump said. "And what I will be doing will be trying to find where they are and get them back to their parents.""
- lacking lawful immigration status in the United States,
- under age 18, and
- without either a parent or legal guardian in the United States, or a parent or legal guardian in the United States who is available to provide care and physical custody.
A statute of limitations is a law that sets the maximum time, usually ranging from one to eight years, within which parties must initiate legal proceedings for civil lawsuits or criminal prosecutions. Once this deadline passes, the claim is typically "time-barred," meaning it cannot be filed, or it is subject to dismissal. The statute of limitations can significantly, and often permanently, negatively affect a legal case. It serves as a strict legal deadline for initiating lawsuits (civil) or prosecution (criminal). If this deadline is missed, the consequences are generally severe, often leading to the automatic dismissal of the case regardless of its merits. When a public personality is protected by the expiration of the criminal statute of limitations, legal avenues for prosecution are generally closed, as the law intends to protect individuals from defending against charges where evidence may have faded. Impacting these individuals shifts from criminal prosecution to civil, social, and reputational mechanisms. Reputational mechanisms are formal and informal systems—such as online reviews, ratings, or industry certifications—that collect, assess, and transmit information about an actor's past behavior to determine their trustworthiness and social standing. They serve as non-market regulators, incentivizing good conduct by penalizing misconduct with reduced reputation. Reputational mechanisms are your responsibility not Bondi's.
United States Attorneys General (1993–Present)
Comments
Post a Comment