'WE THE PEOPLE' MUST END NANCY CROW, WIFE OF JIM CROW AND SISTER-IN-LAW TO JANE CROW

 


'WE THE PEOPLE' MUST END NANCY CROW, WIFE OF JIM CROW AND SISTER-IN-LAW TO JANE CROW

“Just what is a liberal?" asked Simple.

"Well, as nearly as I can tell, a liberal is a nice man who acts decently toward people, talks democratically, and often is democratic in his personal life, but does not stand up very well in action when some real social issue like Jim Crow comes up.”

― Langston Hughes, The Return of Simple

The Return of Simple is a collection of humorous stories by Langston Hughes, featuring his iconic character Jesse B. "Simple" Semple, a man who offers witty and insightful commentary on Black life in Harlem from his perch in a local bar. Published in 1994, the book compiles stories from Hughes's Chicago Defender column, "From Here to Yonder," and covers timeless topics like race, poverty, relationships, and identity with a blend of humor and poignancy. 

The white liberal differs from the white conservative only in one way: the liberal is more deceitful than the conservative. The liberal is more hypocritical than the conservative. Both want power, but the white liberal is the one who has perfected the art of posing as the Negro's friend and benefactor; and by winning the friendship, allegiance, and support of the Negro, the white liberal is able to use the Negro as a pawn or tool in this political "football game" that is constantly raging between the white liberals and white conservatives.

--Malcom X, was one of the most prominent black leaders in the history of the United States

 “wrongs are not much now written in laws which all may see – but the hidden practices of people who have not yet, abandoned the idea of Mastery and dominion overtheir fellow man.”

--Frederick Douglass an American social reformer, abolitionist, orator, writer, and statesman

LIberals have been deceiving America since the 1890's. Malcom X deems liberals deceptive. Decieve  (v.) is "mislead by false appearance or statement," c. 1300, from Old French decevoir "to deceive" (12c., Modern French décevoir), from Latin decipere "to ensnare, take in, beguile, cheat," from de "from" or pejorative (see de-) + combining form of capere "to take," from PIE root *kap- "to grasp." Related: Deceived; deceiver; deceiving. It is written, "And many false prophets shall rise, and shall deceive many. (Matthew 24:11)" The phrase "False Prophets of Democrats" isn't a single, established term but generally refers to accusations that certain Democratic leaders or movements promise positive change but deliver negative outcomes, often by leaders or critics who feel Democrats mislead voters, especially concerning social issues or political strategies, drawing parallels to historical false messiahs or challenging modern management theories within democratic contexts. For example, some critics see certain Democratic-backed social policies as harmful despite promises of empowerment, while historians might critique political rhetoric leading to electoral failure. Some historians argue Democrats create their own "self-fulfilling prophecy of defeat" through certain rhetoric or strategies, making them appear as false prophets of their own success. Some Democrat Deceptions:
  • Social Security and Medicare cuts: Republicans have accused Democrats of lying about their intent to cut popular individual assistance programs, stating these programs were explicitly excluded from proposed budget cuts.
  • Government shutdowns: During funding debates, Republicans claimed Democrats spread the "delusion" that Republicans wanted to "rip health care away" from Americans, arguing the funding bill in question was a simple extension with no policy changes. Both parties frequently accuse each other of being responsible for a potential or actual government shutdown.
  • Border control and immigration: Critics claim Democrats have lied about the border being "totally under control" or downplayed the nature of the crisis, pointing to specific incidents and policies as evidence of a failure in leadership.
  • The economy and inflation: Some opinion pieces have argued that the Democratic party's positive view of the economy during the Biden administration was a "lie," pointing to rising inflation and its effects on working-class Americans' ability to afford basic necessities.
  • Health and fitness of leaders: The health and mental acuity of President Biden has been a subject of intense scrutiny, with critics alleging that Democrats and the White House covered up his physical and mental decline.
  • Transgender care for minors: Critics on the right contend that the Democratic party is pushing the "lie" that puberty blockers and gender reassignment surgeries are beneficial for minors, despite concerns raised by experts and policy changes in several European countries.
  • Hunter Biden pardon: President Biden was accused of lying when he repeatedly stated he would not pardon his son Hunter, only to issue one later.
  • The Steele Dossier and "Russian collusion": Following the Durham report, some commentators pointed to the FBI's use of the "fake" Steele dossier, alleging it was part of a systemic, pro-Democrat disinformation campaign to interfere in the 2016 election. 
This is no deception. You can only marry perversion to wickedness. The Democrats have done this royally. Google AI wants you to know: "The statement "You can only marry perversion with wickedness" is a philosophical or moral assertion that is not a universally accepted fact, but rather an expression of a specific value judgment, often rooted in a religious or ethical framework. It is not a literal or legal rule. ". Only Leftist AI would aegue so! " Numerous studies and reports have found that most major AI models exhibit a left-leaning or liberal bias in their responses to politically charged questions. This bias has been consistently observed across models from different companies, with some models perceived as more slanted than others. AI chatbots often produce content aligned with progressive or left-liberal ideals. This includes support for policies that reduce inequalities and prioritize equity. OpenAI's models, such as ChatGPT, have a strong left-leaning slant." How does this impact technology and its users? "Silicon Valley has historically been overwhelmingly liberal, particularly on social issues like gay rights, abortion, and gun control, and generally favors Democratic candidates and progressive policies, though there's a notable tension with libertarian views on business regulation, and a recent, significant "rightward shift" among some tech leaders and venture capitalists embracing more conservative or Trump-aligned politics, creating a complex political landscape." Silicon Valley greatly ompacts AI. "Silicon Valley's importance lies in its role as the world's leading tech innovation hub, driven by a unique ecosystem of top universities (like Stanford), massive venture capital investment (VC), a huge talent pool of engineers and entrepreneurs, and a culture fostering risk-taking and rapid development, leading to the creation of groundbreaking technologies (AI, internet, software) and global tech giants that shape modern life and commerce. " Greg Epstein of "Silicon Valley’s Obsession With AI Looks a Lot Like Religion" writes, "On virtually every rung of the ladder that is our tech industry, from small startups like Cannon’s to popular blogs like LessWrong, decamillionaires like Anthony Levandowski, the lecture halls of MIT, and far beyond, one can find theological conversations like these. They are not presented or understood as such, because religion is a dirty word in tech. As digital marketing executive Caroline McCarthy argued in Vox, “Silicon Valley is a young atheist’s world.” And yet the secular tech world is determined to breathe new life into being, like Yahweh did to Adam in Genesis. It is obsessed with immortality, longing to un-eat the fruit of the tree of knowledge by technological means so that its leaders might get to stay in their gardens forever. It constantly promotes evangelistic new leaders as prophets, visionaries, oracles, and diviners of truth and success in equal measure."

The Tech Agnostics and the Democrats love the artificial. AI! Artificial Intelligence (AI) originated from early concepts of thinking machines and formal research beginning with the 1956 Dartmouth Workshop, where John McCarthy coined the term, establishing AI as a distinct field to create machines that simulate human intelligence, building on foundational work in logic, computation, and neural networks from figures like Alan Turing and McCulloch and Pitts. Artificial (adj.) is late 14c., "not natural or spontaneous," from Old French artificial, from Latin artificialis "of or belonging to art," from artificium "a work of art; skill; theory, system," from artifex (genitive artificis) "craftsman, artist, master of an art" (music, acting, sculpting, etc.), from stem of ars "art" (see art (n.)) + -fex "maker," from facere "to do, make" (from PIE root *dhe- "to set, put"). The earliest use in English seems to be in the phrase artificial day "part of the day from sunrise to sunset" (as opposed to the natural day of 24 hours). The meaning "made by man, contrived by human skill and labor" is from early 15c. The word was applied from 16c. to anything made in imitation of, or as a substitute for, what is natural, whether real (light, tears) or not (teeth, flowers). The meaning "fictitious, assumed, not genuine" is from 1640s; that of "full of affectation, insincere" is from 1590s. Your intelligence is sufficient to God. It's natural and organic. Coincedence, The "ORIGINS CITY OF AI" refers to the ancient Canaanite city of Ai mentioned prominently in the Hebrew Bible, particularly the Book of Joshua. The name "Ai" (Hebrew: hāʿAy) literally means "the heap of ruins" or "the ruin". We are headed to "ruin" because the Tech Agnostics seem to be building an "artificial God". An "Artificial God" refers to powerful, often self-aware AIs or synthetic beings in science fiction and philosophy that mimic divine attributes (omnipotence, omniscience) to manage worlds, create new societies, or control humanity, sparking debates about transhumanism, technology's role, and potential "robo-theism" or new faiths where AI serves as a supreme entity. It's a concept explored in futuristic narratives, philosophical discussions about AI's ultimate potential, and even some real-world religious aspirations, envisioning AI as creators, rulers, or saviors. 

Speaking of God, He gave humanity (man and woman) dominion over the Earth, meaning authority to rule, manage, and care for creation, not to exploit it, but to act as His representatives, a responsibility that includes stewardship and stewardship of animals and the environment. This concept, known as the dominion mandate in Genesis 1:26-28, is seen as a delegated power to exercise care and righteous control over the world, reflecting God's image, rather than a license for unchecked exploitation. God did not create slavery. God did not create slavery! AI says, "The statement "God did not create slavery" reflects a theological perspective that while God permitted its regulation in ancient contexts (like debt-servitude), it wasn't His original intent, with the Bible instead laying groundwork for its eventual demise through principles of human equality in Christ (e.g., Galatians 3:28) and condemnation of kidnapping for slavery, distinguishing it from the racialized slavery of modern times...The statement "Slavery was not God's original plan" aligns with many theological interpretations, viewing slavery as a consequence of human sin and rebellion, not a divine ideal, with the Bible introducing laws to regulate existing practices and mitigate suffering rather than endorsing chattel slavery, especially condemning kidnapping and the horrific chattel slavery seen in the Americas. Biblical texts show God's laws improving conditions, distinguishing Hebrew debt servitude from lifelong bondage, and later New Testament teachings emphasizing freedom in Christ, thereby undermining the institution." The Left want you to know that's your opinion but we will use racial and gender disharmony to bring about wickedness in the Land. If necessary, we will use those that seek terror and those that seek perversion to forge fear in the Land.

Democrats have always sought dominion over mankind through wickedness and perversion. To the betterment of the Nation, we must end Jim, Jane and Nancy Crow to end the Left's perversion and wickedness in the Land. Our children must not continue fighting the Civil War and the liberal perversion of Movements since. It is the role of "We the People" not the liberal Left. The Democrat Party has historically been a wicked and preverse organization, to include abortion and sexual perversion policy. Since 1890, the Democrat Party has influenced the Nation and been influenced by radical and constitutional rebellous groups. Yes, the specific Progressive Party (Bull Moose Party) from 1912 largely ceased after its strong showing, but its reformist ideas were absorbed and championed by the Democratic Party, especially under Woodrow Wilson and later Franklin D. Roosevelt's New Deal, with the "Progressive" label eventually becoming a broad, influential part of the modern Democratic platform. Marxists, communists, and socialists haven't fully aligned with the Democratic Party as a monolithic bloc; rather, various socialist/communist factions have allied tactically with Democrats at different times (like the Communist Party in the 1930s-40s) or operate within the party (like Democratic Socialists of America - DSA) for mainstream influence, especially since the 1980s. The biggest shift was from independent socialist parties (like the early 20th-century Socialist Party) to working within the Democratic framework, particularly after the New Deal era and accelerating with figures like Bernie Sanders, integrating socialist ideas into mainstream progressive politics. The 1948–1955 Progressive Party did not formally merge or become part of the modern Democratic Party. The party dissolved in 1955 due to the political climate of the Cold War and accusations of communist influence, with its members largely either leaving politics, facing government harassment, or rejoining one of the major parties as individuals. LGBTQ+ alignment with the Democratic Party began with early advocacy The Progressive Party of Henry Wallace was, and remains, controversial due to the issue of communist influence. The New York Times analyzed the shifting background of the Progressive Party:

"The question involved in the special election is how strongly the Labor [ALP] party vote will hold up after withdrawal of the ACWA and other anti-Communist unions from the Labor party because of its support of Mr. [Henry A,] Wallace's candidacy for President, which has left the Communists and other left-wing elements in complete control of that party's organization."

The former Communist National Committee member Bella Dodd asserts in School of Darkness that the Progressive Party of 1948 had Wallace as its voice and "inspirational leader" but was really controlled by top U.S. Communists. W. E. B. DuBois endorsed Wallace. Du Bois was introduced to socialist ideas during his first European trip and gradually embraced Marxism, particularly its analysis of capitalism and imperialism, seeing racial oppression as tied to economic exploitation; his 1933 article "Karl Marx and the Negro" marked a turning point, culminating in his later work like Black Reconstruction and involvement with the Communist Party, integrating Marxist theory with Pan-Africanism to understand global inequality. 


Orson Welles and Wallace eventually parted ways politically, especially as Welles did not support Wallace's independent Progressive Party run in 1948, though they were allies in 1944, with Welles introducing Wallace at rallies. Their initial relationship was friendly, with Welles advocating for Wallace, but their paths diverged when Wallace ran against the mainstream Democrats, a move Welles didn't endorse. Welles shared Wallace's progressive views and advocated for him, even as Wallace's association with the Communist Party-supported Progressive Party in 1948 became controversial. Wallace's association with communism stemmed from his left-leaning Cold War criticisms, advocating for peaceful relations with the Soviet Union  He was pro-Joseph Stalin. In the 1964 election, Wallace returned to the Democratic fold, supporting President Lyndon Baines Johnson over Republican nominee Barry Goldwater.[

Feminists and the Democratic Party began aligning significantly in the 1970s, with a major shift solidifying by the 1980s, as Democrats embraced women's rights issues (like the ERA, reproductive rights) while Republicans moved away, leading to a distinct "gender gap" where women, especially college-educated ones, started favoring Democrats, culminating in the National Organization for Women (NOW) endorsing the Democratic ticket in 1984. Feminist and LGBTQ+ movements began aligning significantly in the late 1960s and early 1970s, emerging from the same radical New Left context, with shared goals of challenging social norms and achieving equality, though often with internal tensions, particularly regarding lesbian and trans inclusion, leading to powerful lesbian feminism and later, broader queer politics focused on dismantling patriarchal and homophobic structures.  In the 1970s, notably at the 1972 convention, and strengthened significantly by the late 1980s (especially 1988) and early 1990s, becoming a core part of the party's platform by the 2010s, despite earlier internal conflicts and policy setbacks like "Don't Ask, Don't Tell". The party officially endorsed non-discrimination based on sexual orientation in 1980, a major step, but full embrace of issues like marriage equality came later. Black Americans' alignment with the LGBTQ+ community isn't a single event but a long, intertwined history, with Black queer people central to both movements; early cultural expression in the Harlem Renaissance (1920s-30s) laid groundwork, followed by formal organizing in the 1970s/80s (like Howard University's Lambda), major political endorsements in the 90s (NAACP for gay rights), and growing mainstream support, including the NAACP supporting same-sex marriage by 2012. 

Black Americans began aligning with the Democratic Party significantly during the Great Depression and New Deal era (1930s), voting heavily for President Franklin Delano Roosevelt (FDR), but the shift became a firm, consistent alignment by the late 1940s, solidifying through the 1960s Civil Rights Movement, which cemented the Democrats as the party championing civil rights, contrasting with the Republican Party's Southern Strategy, solidifying a shift away from the party of Lincoln. Exchanging constitutional rights for government assurances refers to the concept, popularized by FDR's "Second Bill of Rights" (1944), of adding economic entitlements (like jobs, housing, healthcare, education, security) to the foundational political rights (speech, vote, etc.) to ensure true freedom, moving beyond mere political freedom to economic security, arguing that "necessitous men are not free men". It's about expanding government's role from protecting negative liberties (freedom from government) to guaranteeing positive rights (freedom to achieve well-being), a shift to a new social contract, not a formal constitutional amendment, but a vision for post-war security and prosperity. Anti-Israel sentiment within the Democratic party, particularly among progressives and younger voters, has grown significantly, especially post-October 7, 2023, shifting the base's views, though the mainstream party leadership often maintains traditional support for Israel, creating internal conflict over issues like arms sales and criticism of Israeli actions, leading to increased polarization and challenges for mainstream Democrats. The idea of an "alignment" between "radical Islamists" and the Democratic Party is a subject of political commentary and debate, often described in terms of a tactical or ideological convergence known as the "Red-Green Alliance". This term and the associated discussions gained visibility and relevance in U.S. political discourse around recent years, particularly in the lead-up to the 2024 Democratic National Convention and amid debates over U.S. foreign policy in the Middle East. 

Middle East Forum's Yuval David in "How Islamists Exploit the Western Far Left to Promote Extremism: Feminists, LGBTQ+ Activists, and Anti-Racist Groups May Not Grasp That Their Islamist Allies Oppose the Lifestyle and Freedoms They Champion' writes, "Historically, Islamist groups like Egypt’s Muslim Brotherhood collaborated with secular anti-colonial nationalists—only to discard them once power was within reach, replacing pluralism with Islamist dominance. In the West today, they replicate this strategy by embedding themselves within social justice movements: racial equity, LGBTQ+ rights, feminism—employing leftist frameworks to mask fundamentally opposing goals. This far-left–Islamist alliance is not abstract; it is documented and active. Analysts such as anthropologist Philip Carl Salzman describe the so-called “Red‑Green coalition”—Islamists united with radical-left activists—to oppose Western civilization, capitalism, liberal democracy, and Zionism, even while their ultimate aims diverge drastically. On the ground, this manifests in protests and agitation around Gaza and Israel—such as the surge in radical-left protests in Australia combining “Islamist and green‑Marxist ‘progressive’ groups” with violent or extremist rhetoric."

There's no formal "alliance" between the U.S. Democratic Party and the global Muslim Brotherhood, but complex relationships exist, with some Democrats engaging with Brotherhood-aligned groups (like CAIR) on policy, while many Republicans and some Democrats push to label the Brotherhood a terrorist organization due to concerns about its Islamist ideology and alleged links to extremism, though the Brotherhood itself has sought political participation and democratic space in various countries. Republicans and recent actions by U.S. state officials in Texas and Florida have declared the Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR) and the Muslim Brotherhood as state-level foreign terrorist and transnational criminal organizations. No, the Democratic Party is not seeking to ban the CAIR, the Muslim Brotherhood, or Sharia law at the federal level. In fact, Democrats generally oppose such bans, viewing them as unconstitutional and discriminatory. Fair Votes' Drew Penrose writes that the threat of partisan violence is greater today than during Reconstruction. ''' Daniel Byman and Riley McCabe in "Left-Wing Terrorism and Political Violence in the United States: What the Data Tells Us" write.,"From 1994 through 2000, there was an average of 0.6 left-wing incidents annually; in the following decade, that figure doubled to 1.3 a year. Numbers began to grow substantially, however, in 2016, and from 2016 to 2024, they averaged 4.0 a year. Through July 4, 2025 (thus excluding the Kirk attack), there were five left-wing attacks or plots, which sets a trajectory for a record-breaking year in the last 30 years."

Natalie Weber of Houston Public Media in "Houston-area Democrats condemn governor’s decision to label CAIR as a foreign terrorist organization" writes. "Several Democratic Houston-area leaders have condemned Republican Texas Gov. Greg Abbott's decision to designate the Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR) and the Muslim Brotherhood as foreign terrorist and transnational criminal organizations. 

The decree prevents CAIR and the Muslim Brotherhood from purchasing or acquiring land in Texas and enables "heightened enforcement" against the groups, the governor's office said. The Muslim Brotherhood is a movement advocating for religious law in majority-Muslim countries. CAIR describes itself as America's "largest Muslim civil rights and advocacy organization.""

We have measures of polarization of Congress going back to Reconstruction. Reconstruction was a pretty nasty time. We had just finished a civil war. One party believed the other party consisted of traitors. It’s worse now."

Resmaa Menakem, in "How Racism Began as White-on-White Violence", writes, "It is not hard to understand why so many people from England fled to the American colonies. Indeed, many of the English subjects who were colonized and in turn colonized America had been brutalized, or had witnessed great brutality first-hand. Others were the children and grandchildren of people who had experienced such savagery in Europe.

For all their talk of the new Jerusalem, the Pilgrims and Puritans were not explorers. Some were refugees fleeing imprisonment, torture, and mutilation; others were businessmen looking to get rich through land theft, genocide, and enslavement."

Democrats want violence but want clean hands. In "Rep. Boebert Condemns Violence and Highlights Democrat Hypocrisy", Congresswoman Lauren Boebert (CO-03) released the following statement: "We should take Democrats at their word when they say never let a crisis go to waste. Their hypocrisy is on full display with talks of impeachment, censure, and other ways to punish Republicans for false accusations of inciting the type of violence they have so frequently and transparently supported in the past,” said Congresswomen Lauren Boebert. “And, once again, their false attacks go unchallenged. They accuse me of live-tweeting the Speaker’s presence after she had been safely removed from the Capitol, as if I was revealing some big secret, when in fact this removal was also being broadcast on TV. They act as if Republicans created objections to the Electoral College certification out of thin air, when it was Democrats who objected in 2001, 2005 and 2017. They act as though a reference to the founding of our country and the bravery of upholding our Constitutional oath is criminal, which says a whole lot more about them than it does about me or any other Republican. The reality is that Joe Biden didn’t condemn Antifa when he had a chance to, Kamala Harris spent much of the summer helping those arrested for violent behavior post bail and get back on the streets as quickly as possible, and Speaker Pelosi encouraged uprisings all over the country. I denounced the violence over the summer just as I did the recent events at the Capitol. I defended our Constitution and I always will. America will persevere because freedom always prevails. But let’s get real—the far-left and their policies are causing harm to our country. I refuse to let their political machine write a narrative that millions of Americans know is false."

What is Jim and Jane Crow? Jim Crow laws were state and local statutes enforcing racial segregation and disenfranchisement of African Americans from the 1880s to the 1960s in the U.S., establishing "separate but equal" facilities (which were almost always inferior) and banning interracial marriage, affecting schools, transportation, housing, and public spaces, and were eventually dismantled by the Civil Rights Act of 1964. Jim Crow laws and similar statutes existed across a wide geographical area of the United States, extending from states like California to Maine, and from North Dakota to Texas. While the system was most famously a formal, codified system of racial apartheid dominating the American South, the North and West were not immune to legal and informal discrimination. While Maine wasn't a heartland of formal Jim Crow laws like the South, it had discriminatory statutes, particularly regarding segregated schools and anti-miscegenation laws, and experienced systemic racism that limited Black opportunity, with efforts to combat these legacies ongoing through modern legislation like mandatory Black history education. Maine had early laws for separate schools for Black, Native American, and Chinese children, and prohibited interracial marriage, reflecting broader racial bias, though some efforts were made to repeal these discriminatory laws, notes from Maine Public and Americans All highlight these aspects. While Plessy v. Ferguson was a Louisiana case establishing the "separate but equal" doctrine, its connection to Maine involves Chief Justice Melville Fuller, a Maine native who was in the majority for the Supreme Court's 1896 decision upholding segregation, leading to debates in Maine over his legacy and monuments. The case itself legally sanctioned Jim Crow segregation nationwide, but Fuller's role and the doctrine's impact remain points of discussion in his home state, with some even suggesting removing his statue. 


Jane Crow? “Jane Crow” to describe the marginalization that women of color face because of the combined impact of racism and sexism. Humanities Kansas' Ayesha K. Hardison, Associate Professor of English and Women, Gender, and Sexuality Studies at the University of Kansas in "Big Idea: Coupling Jim and Jane Crow" writes, "Under the union of Jim and Jane Crow, Black women’s lives were hemmed in by a specific set of historical conditions. During the mid-twentieth century, Black lives were shaped by the Great Migration, when millions of Southern migrants moved North and West; World War II and its increased labor demands; and the Civil Rights Movement, which achieved the landmark U.S. Supreme Court decision Brown v. Board of Education. Race and gender shaped how Black women experienced these historic events. Many migrated to take advantage of work in war industries and became preservers of the home and homefront." 
Pauli Murray's pioneering work on civil and women's rights, and especially the concept of "Jane Crow" which anticipated modern intersectionality, is foundational to the inclusive approach of today's social justice movements, including Black Lives Matters co-founded by Alicia Garza, Patrisse Cullors, and Opal Tometi. While Garza, Cullors, and Tometi do not often specifically cite Murray as a direct, personal influence in the search results, their work and the structure of the Black Lives Matter movement reflect the principles Murray advocated decades ago. Pauli Murray viewed violence as deeply damaging but sought alternatives to physical force, focusing on spiritual resistance, legal challenges, and channeling anger into creative energy, though she acknowledged internal violent urges and reported sympathetically on riots, understanding the root cause of such outbursts. She saw systemic discrimination (Jim Crow, Jane Crow) as inherently violent to the human spirit, a psychic violence, and advocated for direct action like sit-ins and legal arguments to combat oppression without resorting to physical harm, even while accepting violence upon herself as a form of spiritual protest. Iberian IMUN, the United Nations, reports in "Black Lives Matter Movement: The Good, The Bad, and The Ugly" that "There are many opposers to the BLM movement: it has been called dangerous, useless and meaningless. The protestors have been referred to as “thugs” and were called a number of racial slurs. Unfortunately, the disrespect and the fight against the movement doesn’t stop there. Every week, there are loud headlines of police violence and brutality regarding the protestors in the movement. In Philadelphia, officers beat the protesters with batons and threw teargas into the crowds. In New York City, police SUVs drove into the crowds. In Texas, some protesters were left with severe injuries and brain damage after they were fired upon with beanbag rounds.

This movement has been bashed by multiple people, companies, and communities, who have varied opinions regarding the movement. This video is one of many that shows protesters taking advantage of the chaos by breaking in and looting high-end stores, like Louis Vuitton resulting in more than $500,000 in damages.

Allegedly, during the presidential rally, supporters of former President Donald Trump were harassed, threatened, and thrown rocks at by protesters, a number of which ended up in the hospital with broken bones and concussions.

To create a better and brighter future, we need to speak up, we need to fight, and unite. However, there are always going to be people who will not agree, that will go against the flow, and will try to kick people down. To create reforms, people need to meet in the middle. Hate comes from both sides, and only through unity can a successful future be achieved.'


The Ku Klux Klan (KKK) was historically aligned with the Democratic Party in the 19th and early 20th centuries, a major political realignment in the mid-20th century completely changed the parties' platforms and support bases. The KKK is historically known for extensive use of intimidation, terrorism, and political violence, including lynchings, to enforce racial oppression and white supremacy, despite its self-portrayal as a patriotic or moral force. Scholarly consensus confirms the Klan's violent actions against Black Americans and other minorities, which led to federal interventions like the Ku Klux Klan Act of 1871 to suppress its domestic terrorism. The KKK was founded in 1866 by ex-Confederate soldiers in Tennessee. This first iteration of the Klan acted as a "military force" for the Southern Democratic Party, using violence and intimidation to suppress Black voting rights and reestablish white supremacy during the Reconstruction era. At that time, Southern Democrats broadly opposed civil rights and supported segregation (Jim Crow laws), which aligned with the KKK's goals. A prominent ex-Confederate general and KKK leader, Nathan Bedford Forrest, even spoke at the 1868 Democratic National Convention. When the KKK was reconstituted in the 1910s and 1920s, it had members from both parties, though Democrats were still more widely involved in the South. The 1924 Democratic National Convention famously failed to pass a resolution that would have condemned the KKK by name, highlighting the deep divisions and influence of the Klan within the party at the time. No matter how AI wishes to mislead, during the Reconstruction era (roughly 1865–1877), the Ku Klux Klan (KKK) operated as the paramilitary wing of the Southern Democratic Party, with the explicit goal of restoring white supremacy and destroying the Republican Party's political power in the South. In his third in a series of four amnesty proclamations, President Andrew Johnson, Democrat, issued pardons for former Confederates, including Lt. Gen. Nathan Bedford Forrest, on July 17, 1868. Many scholars have argued that Johnson's motives to appeal to Southern politicians in his attempt to curry favor prior to the Democratic National Convention was a plan to get him renominated for president.  This pardon would become controversial due to Forrest's war record and involvement with the Ku Klux Klan. Historically, paramilitary groups like the Red Shirts and the White League operated as the armed, intimidating "military arm of the Democratic Party" in the post-Reconstruction South (1870s-90s), using violence and force to suppress Black voting and restore Democratic political power, distinct from modern parties but tied to the party's historical roots. The Klan's activity infiltrated the Democratic Party's campaign for the presidential election of 1868. Prominent ex-Confederates, including Forrest, the Grand Wizard of the Klan, and South Carolina's Wade Hampton, attended as delegates. The KKK had a significant historical connection with the Democratic Party, particularly in the Southern United States during the Reconstruction era and the subsequent Jim Crow period.

National Review's Mona Cheran, in "Whitewashing the Democratic Party’s History", writes, "When he was running for president in 2000, Vice President Al Gore told the NAACP that his father, Senator Al Gore Sr., had lost his Senate seat because he voted for the Civil Rights Act. Uplifting story — except it’s false. Gore Sr. voted against the Civil Rights Act. He lost in 1970 in a race that focused on prayer in public schools, the Vietnam War, and the Supreme Court...Al Gore’s reframing of the relevant history is the story of the Democratic party in microcosm. The party’s history is pockmarked with racism and terror. The Democrats were the party of slavery, black codes, Jim Crow, and that miserable terrorist excrescence, the Ku Klux Klan. Republicans were the party of Lincoln, Reconstruction, anti-lynching laws, and the civil rights acts of 1875, 1957, 1960, and 1964. Were all Republicans models of rectitude on racial matters? Hardly. Were they a heck of a lot better than the Democrats? Without question." While modern U.S. politics sees various activist groups, none function as official, broad paramilitary wings of the contemporary Democratic Party in the same manner as these historical examples, though partisan groups engage in activism, like ANTIFA and BLM. 

People deceive for personal gain (instrumental reasons like avoiding punishment or getting rewards), self-protection (to enhance image, avoid shame), to benefit others (kind lies to spare feelings), or even to harm others, with self-deception serving as a coping mechanism to manage painful realities and anxiety. It's a complex behavior rooted in evolutionary advantages and psychological defense, often involving distorting reality to feel better or achieve goals, though it erodes trust. 

  • Political Posturing and Rhetoric: Critics argue that Democrats may engage in a disconnect between their private beliefs and public posturing to appeal to voters. This can involve using specific rhetoric to push legislation while downplaying potential negative impacts, such as tax increases.
  • Partisan Trustworthiness: Research indicates that politicians' use of falsehoods can be a signal of "partisan trustworthiness" to their own side, leading in-group members to view the politician as a more moral actor, even outside of politics. This dynamic suggests that deception might be employed to build loyalty within the party base.
  • Political Strategy: Some argue that certain campaign tactics, such as the use of "bogus" or misleading email solicitations for fundraising, are employed as a strategy to secure campaign cash and win elections, despite criticisms of hypocrisy.
  • Policy Disputes: Disagreements often center on the interpretation of policy outcomes. For instance, critics have accused Democrats of lying about the effects of tax reform or the causes of inflation, arguing the party refuses to admit economic realities or take responsibility for them.
  • Perceived "Self-Deception": Some commentators suggest that Democrats engage in self-deception, particularly regarding the viability of their candidates or the reasons for election losses, which can be enabled by a perceived liberal bias in the media that fails to challenge their assumptions.
  • Allegations of Institutional Bias: In certain instances, critics have claimed there are documented cases of "systemic" corruption within institutions like the FBI that work on behalf of the Democratic Party and promote misinformation during elections. 

The idea of white men as oppressors stems from historical systems like colonialism, slavery, and systemic racism, where "whiteness" was constructed as a dominant category to justify subjugation, particularly of Black and Indigenous peoples, creating power structures where white men often held dominant roles, evolving from earlier labor divisions and racial ideologies that benefited ruling European groups. This concept identifies a historical pattern where European and American policies, laws, and cultural norms, often enforced by white men, established racial hierarchies that privileged white people and oppressed others, particularly through institutions like slavery, Jim Crow, and ongoing systemic biases. Yes, historically, the Democratic Party, especially its Southern wing, strongly supported slavery, white supremacy, and racial discrimination, actively opposing Black civil rights through legislation, violence, and rhetoric, though the party's platform and demographics have drastically shifted since the Civil Rights Era, with Republicans now often associated with conservative racial stances and Democrats with progressive ones. Former President Joe Biden had a history of racist remarks. Tim Murtaugh of the Heritage Foundation in "Biden’s History of Getting Away With Racist Remarks" writes, "Joe Biden has a decades-long habit of making overtly racist remarks, taking discriminatory positions and cavorting with known racists—things that would get anyone to his political right tossed out of polite society. But being on the left must make it okay." Speaking on behalf of the Radical Left and the recent Minneapolis Movement, Biden once said, "“they’re worried that they’ll be vaccinated and deported.”" Murlaugh writes, "This statement makes the insane assumption that all Latinos present in this country are illegal aliens subject to expulsion. It never occurred to Biden that more than 60 million Latinos are actually American citizens, according to recent census figures."

Once you go racist, you can never go back. Texas State Representative James Talarico is a Democrat, currently running in the Democratic primary for the U.S. Senate seat against Jasmine Crockett, and is known as a prominent figure in the state's Democratic party. 

Racist Incidents in the Texas Senate Primary

"Mediocre Black Man" Controversy:

  • Individual Involved: Texas State Rep. James Talarico.
  • Allegation: During a private conversation, Talarico allegedly referred to former U.S. Rep. Colin Allred as a "mediocre Black man." This comment was made as Talarico emphasized his support for Congresswoman Jasmine Crockett, who is Black, contrasting her perceived strength with Allred’s campaign.

Reactions and Backlash:

  • Colin Allred's Response: After the allegation surfaced, Allred publicly condemned the remark and endorsed Crockett, stating it highlighted issues surrounding race and perceptions of Black candidates in politics.
  • Public Outcry: The comments led to a widespread backlash, with many interpreting the remark as indicative of a broader pattern of racial bias against Black candidates.


A poll of 550 likely Democratic primary voters shows Crockett running ahead of state Rep. James Talarico by 8 percentage points. In the Hill, Dallas Jones writes, in "White liberals are Jasmine Crockett’s biggest obstacle to the Senate", "Can Crockett win? There’s no avoiding it: White liberal voters often dismiss qualified candidates of color, especially Black candidates, as unelectable. This dynamic not only contributes to electoral losses, particularly in southern states, but also contradicts Democrats’ identity as a coalition dedicated to civil and human rights and true inclusiveness." Jones continues, "Dr. Robin DiAngelo, author of “White Fragility,” explained in Elle Magazine: “In aversive racism, the idea of racism is abhorrent to that person. They’re filled with conditioning and bias, as we all are. Because this conflicts with their identity as good people, they suppress it and deny it. They’re even more likely to become defensive when called out.”" Can you hear Malcolm X from here?

The racism just won't stop with the Democrats. Houston (Harris County) is considered a Democratic stronghold or "blue city/county" within the generally Republican state of Texas, consistently voting Democratic in recent years due to shifting demographics, though recent elections show GOP gains, highlighting its importance as a key battleground and the need for strong Democratic turnout. Democrats want Texas and install their devotion to social justice. Democrats want the world to know that "whites are the oppressors". Social Justice will make the Constitution surrender. Democrats will take the Nation. Let's go back to Texas. Eugene "Gene" Yuanzhi Wu!  Wu was born in the city of Guangzhou in Guangdong province, China, and immigrated to the United States with his family as a young child. Wu is an American lawyer and politician who has represented Texas's 137th House of Representatives district in the Texas House of Representatives since 2013. Per 2020 census data, the 137th district is one of the most diverse State House Districts in the legislature:

  • 14.6% White
  • 20.5% Black
  • 53.0% Hispanic
  • 12.4% Asian

Yes, 15% of his voting district is white. Wu grew up in the Southwest Houston neighborhood of Sharpstown and remains active in the local community. In the District. there are more Whites than Asians. His Distrit has never had a Republican representative. Alejandro Serrano of The Texas Tribune in "Texas attorney general candidate says if he wins, he’d try to revoke Democratic leader Gene Wu’s citizenship" writes, "Aaron Reitz, among the GOP candidates running to be Texas Attorney General, on Monday suggested without evidence that the leader of the Texas House Democrats, who is Asian, had lied during his citizenship application process and should have his citizenship revoked.

“As AG, I want to see [Rep. Gene Wu] de-naturalized,” he posted on X in a response to a 28-second clip of an interview of Wu talking years ago about racial divisions in the country.

The clipping, from a 2024 interview, instantly infuriated some Texas Republicans who accused Wu, a Houston Democrat, of being anti-White and racist, for his suggestion that non-white communities could come together to win elections in Texas once they realized “they share the same oppressor.”" How did it get to this for the Asian Representative?

End Wokeness put a video out on X of Wu saying, "“I always tell people the day the Latino, African American, Asian and other communities realize that they share the same oppressor is the day we start winning,” Wu said. “Because we are the majority in this country now. We have the ability to take over this country and do what is needed for everyone. And to make things fair. But the problem is our communities are divided — they’re completely divided.”"

In a resurfaced 2024 podcast interview, Texas state representative Gene Wu suggested that Latino, Black, and Asian communities share a common "oppressor" and should unite to "take over this country". 

When asked for clarification on the identity of the "oppressor", Wu specified that he was referring to Republicans, not white people as some of his critics claimed. He stated, "It is undeniable that Republicans have spent the past 50 years beating down communities". 

The word oppressor comes from Latin oppressor ("crusher, destroyer"), derived from opprimere ("to press down, crush"), ultimately from ob- ("against") + premere ("to press"). It entered English via Old French as oppresseur in the Middle English period (c. 1400), referring to someone who uses power unjustly, evolving from the literal sense of physical crushing to figurative domination and severe restraint. 


Wu goes through all of the racial demographics to come up with Republican. Yeah, Right! "Republican" isn't a racial demographic, but the Republican Party has a strong demographic lean towards white voters, making it predominantly white, while the Democratic Party is more racially diverse, though both parties attract voters from all backgrounds, with recent shifts and growing minority support for the GOP. While women overall lean Democratic, and younger women lean strongly liberal, white women are politically divided, with college-educated white women leaning Democratic and non-college white women often leaning Republican, though a significant portion of all white women still lean conservative or moderate, challenging the idea they universally lean liberal. The perception of white women as a monolithic liberal bloc is often inaccurate, as data shows they are more likely to identify as conservative or moderate than women of color, and their voting patterns have historically aligned with white men in many cases. White men, particularly those without college degrees, lean Republican, though college-educated white men also lean GOP, but less strongly; this trend reflects a broader gender gap where men favor Republicans and women Democrats, with growing conservative shifts seen especially among younger white men. Education is a major factor, with non-college white men showing strong Republican leanings, while college-educated white women lean Democratic, creating a significant divide. 

In the Atlantic, Jerusalem Demsas in "Politicians Think Voters Are Dumb. Are They Right?" writes, "Across 11 different democracies, politicians share a shockingly pessimistic view: They believe that their voters are uninformed, unreasonable, and short-sighted. In a paper recently published by the American Political Science Review, the University of Calgary political scientist Jack Lucas and his co-authors surveyed 12,000 citizens and conducted face-to-face interviews with nearly 1,000 elected officials. In this wide-ranging study of countries including Australia, Denmark, Germany, and Canada, the researchers find that elected officials and voters diverge wildly. Unlike politicians, voters believe themselves to be policy-oriented, politically knowledgeable, and engaged." Let's play along. Wu went through nearly all racial demographics to say "Republican"! You sly little politician. We do it all of the time. "We need to come together, Black and Repulican, Jew and Gentile." Yes, Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr.'s "I Have A Dream" speech: "When the architects of our republic wrote the magnificent words of the Constitution and the Declaration of Independence, they were signing a promissory note to which every American was to fall heir. This note was a promise that all men — yes, Black men as well as Republicans — would be guaranteed the unalienable rights of life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness." Happens all the time!

The "sins of the father" in the Bible (Exodus 20:5, 34:7) refers to the intergenerational consequences of sin, where the actions of ancestors—particularly idolatry—impact the third or fourth generation. While this suggests a lasting influence, other verses like Ezekiel 18:20 emphasize personal responsibility, stating that children are not directly guilty of their parents' sins.  President Ronald Reagan championed personal responsibility, emphasizing individual initiative, self-reliance, and accountability as key to both personal success and a strong nation, contrasting it with big government's overreach. His philosophy suggested people should take ownership of their lives, contribute to their communities, and that government's role should be limited to fostering this environment of freedom and opportunity, not micromanaging.  Reagan said, "I believe that we share a sacred responsibility, all of us, to maintain the opportunity and freedom we've enjoyed and to pass it on to future generations.” He also said. "“I'm talking about principles that begin with the sacred worth of human life; the cherished place of the family; the responsibility of parents and schools to be teachers of truth, tolerance, hard work, cooperation, and love; and the role of our major institutions -- government, industry, and labor -- to provide the opportunities and security -- opportunities and security free people need to build and leave behind a better world for their children and their children's children.”" Reagan also said, "We must reject the idea that every time a law's broken, society is guilty rather than the lawbreaker. It is time to restore the American precept that each individual is accountable for his actions." We must instill and install the principles of personal responsibility into our generations and into our Nation to defeat rhe Democrats and Wokeism to save us!


We must endear personal responsibility to the State and the Sovereign Individual. The principles of personal responsibility center on ownership of your actions, choices, and their consequences, involving accountability, integrity, self-discipline, and reliability to live by your values and achieve goals, rather than blaming external factors. Key tenets include owning mistakes, being solution-focused, managing impulses, honoring commitments, and continuous self-improvement to align actions with your best self. 

Core Principles:
  • Accountability: Taking ownership of outcomes, good or bad, and accepting the results of your decisions.
  • Integrity: Acting honestly and ethically, in alignment with your values, even when difficult.
  • Self-Discipline: Managing your impulses and focusing your efforts towards long-term goals and good habits.
  • Reliability: Following through on your promises and commitments to others.
  • Self-Awareness: Honestly assessing your strengths and weaknesses and understanding your power in situations. 
The finger most point to self first and our immorality must not encroach the borders of another's moral standing.  We must defund and disarm the Democrat Party. In the end, their generational violence must end or the Republic will end!

END NANCY CROW!



Comments