TEACH MY GRANDSON: THEY ARE NOT VULNERABLE; THEY ARE IGNORED

 

TEACH MY GRANDSON: THEY ARE NOT VULNERABLE; THEY ARE IGNORED

Grandson. who were they. They were doctors, lawyers, teachers and custodians. They were fathers. mothers, sisters and brothers. They were the man who laughed too loud. They were the woman who had too many cats. They were the ones that got on your last nerve. They were the ones that wore milk mustaches from stealing the milk cartoons from the refrigerator. They were the ones who were always "cold" when everyone else suffered from a "heat wave". They were the short ones. They were the tall ones. They were the ones who always worked. They were the ones who always played. They were the loud ones. They were the soft ones. They were the innocent. They were the guilty. They were you and you will be they. Not vulnerable but ignored. We are the ignored.

Ignore (v.) is 1610s, "not to know, to be ignorant of," from French ignorer "be unaware of" (14c.), or directly from Latin ignorare "not to know, be unacquainted; take no notice of, disregard" (see ignorant). The original sense in English is obsolete. Sense of "pass over without notice, pay no attention to" in English first recorded 1801 (Barnhart says "probably a dictionary word"), and OED indicates it was uncommon before c. 1850. Related: Ignored; ignoring. They like to call us "vulnerable". Code of the District of Columbia § 22–932 Definitions says a ""Vulnerable adult" means a person who is 18 years of age or older and has one or more physical or mental limitations that substantially impair the person's ability to independently provide for his or her daily needs or safeguard his or her person, property, or legal interests." Vulnerable (adj.) is "capable of being wounded," c. 1600, from Late Latin vulnerabilis "wounding," from Latin vulnerare "to wound, hurt, injure, maim," from vulnus (genitive vulneris) "wound," perhaps related to vellere "pluck, to tear" (see svelte), or from PIE *wele-nes-, from *wele- (2) "to strike, wound" (see Valhalla). DC Law Library says we can suffer from "undue influence". "Undue influence" means mental, emotional, or physical coercion that overcomes the free will or judgment of a vulnerable adult or elderly person and causes the vulnerable adult or elderly person to act in a manner that is inconsistent with the vulnerable adult or elderly person's financial, emotional, mental, or physical well-being. Eventually. you become acquainted with the fact that you will be "passed over without notice, paid no attention to".


Ecclesiastes 12:13-14:

13 Let us hear the conclusion of the whole matter: Fear God, and keep his commandments: for this is the whole duty of man.

14 For God shall bring every work into judgment, with every secret thing, whether it be good, or whether it be evil.


This is where a mindless interpretation of the Work of God is perverssive flourishing in the Earth. This is where people stand boldly and declare, "God will eventually judge the seen and unseen. Thus, we can rest and rely only in divine jurisprudence for it will be a perfect and complete work". While the Bible emphasizes that God is the ultimate Judge and source of perfect justice (James 4:12), the perspective that "man has no role" in doing justice is not supported by scripture. Instead, the biblical view is that humans are called to be active participants in enacting justice, acting as God's representatives on earth, while trusting Him for the final outcome. Yet, still they declare you are a pagan or fool, if you don't fall in line with their misinterpretaion of Scripture, "You don't know my God! You have little faith! You are talking about vengeance not justice. The Bible says, 'Vengeance is the Lord's'" The Bible says, "Jesus wept" but are you using it in the right context. Relying on God for justice means trusting Him as the ultimate, perfect judge who will right wrongs, offering comfort to the oppressed while also calling His followers to act justly in their own lives by loving mercy and walking humbly, as seen in Micah 6:8 and Deuteronomy 32:4. It involves surrendering personal vengeance (Romans 12:19) to God, who is impartial and cares deeply for the vulnerable, knowing His justice is established and trustworthy, and we are called to join His work by living righteously. 

There is a difference between justice and vengeance. Paul writes in Romans 12:19 that Cnristians are "not to avenge themselves". Doesn't that mean we aeek not justice? Avenge from that Scripture is Blue Letter Bible Lexicon Strong's G1556 - ekdikeō meaning:
  • to vindicate one's right, do one justice
    • to protect, defend, one person from another
  • to avenge a thing
    • to punish a person for a thing
See, Ken, it says seek not justice by avenging yourself or another.

Context, please! You might want to check out Leviticus 19:18:

Thou shalt not avenge, nor bear any grudge against the children of thy people, but thou shalt love thy neighbour as thyself: I am the LORD.

Avenge, in our context, is taken from the Blue Letter Bible Lexicon Strong's H5358 - nāqam meaning: 

to avenge, take vengeance, revenge, avenge oneself, be avenged, be punished
  • (Qal)
    • to avenge, take vengeance
    • to entertain revengeful feelings
  • (Niphal)
    • to avenge oneself
    • to suffer vengeance
  • (Piel) to avenge
  • (Hophal) to be avenged, vengeance be taken (for blood)
  • (Hithpael) to avenge oneself
In Hebrew, the primary word for "avenge" is נָקַם (naqam), which means to take vengeance, but in Jewish tradition, this often shifts from personal revenge to God's justice or communal vindication, distinct from personal payback which is prohibited (Leviticus 19:18). Another key term is גָּאַל (go'el), meaning redeemer, referring to a relative who avenges a murder as the "avenger of blood" (go'el hadam), a duty rooted in justice, not personal vendetta. The Hebrew verb נָקַם nâqam (Strong's #5358, x35) "avenge" first occurs in the Genesis 4:15 story of Cain's murder of Abel and subsequent fear that he would be sought out and killed himself. Instead, God says to him, "Therefore, whoever kills Cain, vengeance shall be taken on him sevenfold". So the first record of a murder and its punishment in the Bible is actually treated with merciful banishment, of which Cain still complains (v.13), rather than an eye for an eye lethal stoning, so typical of our Old Testament perception of criminal punishment. Again, a phrase reminiscent of New Testament Christian theology but taken from the heart of the Old Testament Law is Leviticus 19:18 "...you shall love your neighbour as yourself". Oddly the first half of this verse is less often quoted, "You shall not take vengeance, nor bear any grudge against the children of your people". Loving thy neighbour is a response to deeds about which we would like to exercise vengeance whereas God requires us to leave this to him and to exercise the same mercy we would like meted out to ourselves.


In "Vengeance". Rabbi Lord Jonathan Sacks writes, "One of the most tragic moments in Western civilisation came when Christians began distinguishing between what they called “the Old Testament God of vengeance” as opposed to the “New Testament God of love.” This is not a small error. One trembles to think how many Jews lost their lives because of it. It survives today, even among good and sensitive people. There is hardly a week when I do not see some reference to it in the national press. It is one of those taken-for-granted assumptions that lie buried so deep within a culture that rarely if ever are they examined in the clear light of day.

Let us state a proposition so obvious that it should go without saying. According to Christianity, the God of the “Old Testament” and the God of the “New” is the same God. If He were not, the whole structure of Christianity would crumble and fall. There was one thinker – Marcion in the second century – who reached the alternative conclusion, namely that the values of Judaism and Christianity are so different that they cannot be seen as worship of the same God. Therefore Christianity would have to stand on the New Testament alone. The Old Testament could not, for Christians, be sacred scripture. The Marcionite option was rejected and branded a heresy."

Justice is the principle of fairness and moral rightness, involving impartial treatment, the administration of law, and the equitable distribution of benefits and burdens, aiming to correct wrongs, punish crimes, and ensure rights are upheld, though its specific application varies from legal systems (like ensuring due process) to broader concepts of social, economic, or political fairness. In Webstee's 1828 Dictionary, "VENGEANCE, noun venj'ance. [Latin vindico.]

The infliction of pain on another, in return for an injury or offense. Such infliction, when it proceeds from malice or more resentment, and is not necessary for the purposes of justice, is revenge, and a most heinous crime. When such infliction proceeds from a mere love of justice, and the necessity of punishing offenders for the support of the laws, it is vengeance and is warrantable and just. In this case, vengeance is a just retribution, recompense or punishment. In this latter sense the word is used in Scripture, and frequently applied to the punishments inflicted by God on sinners.

To me belongeth vengeance and recompense. Deuteronomy 32:35.

The Lord will take vengeance on his adversaries. Nahum 1.

With a vengeance in familiar language, signifies with great violence or vehemence; as, to strike one with a vengeance

Formerly, what a vengeance was a phrase used for what emphatical.

But what a vengeance makes thee fly?"


Patient abuse is a crime in the District of Columbia. DC law specifically criminalizes the abuse and neglect of vulnerable adults and elderly persons, with penalties escalating based on the severity of the injury. Criminal Abuse of a Vulnerable Adult (D.C. Code § 22-933): It is a crime for any person to knowingly or purposefully inflict physical pain or injury, harass, or unreasonably confine a vulnerable adult (defined as an individual 18+ with a physical or mental condition that prevents them from providing for their own care).

I have been ignored by spouse, family, friend, foe, Church, State, lawyers, media, not for profits, even the Boy Scouts and Girl Scouts of America. I was made vulnerable by being ignored.

I sought Justice not Vegeance! I did not want to personally and violently deaw blood from the nurses and technicians that assaulted me. MedStar Washington, December 2023, DC MPD CCN 26007 303 and Cherrydale Health & Rehabilitation Center, June 2024, Arlington County police verification 2024-05010099. After years of refutation and rebuke from wife, family, friend and foe alike, I finally was given the oppurtunity to report the December 2023 crime against me on Friday, January 16, 2026. All I could hear after giving Officer Leslie Gandy were the words of the MedStar nurse that attacked me, "Who's going to believe you over the doctors and nurses?" It took nearly three years and a formal Police Complaint before anyone responded. DC Metropolitan Police (DC MPD) don't respond to email. Why did you choose e-mail? It was the only form of communication that I had. MedStar had requested that ny wife seize my phone and I never got it back. Lieutenant Hakeem Ayodeji scheduled Gandy's visit. The visit was a week delayed. An unidentified called earlier and left an unreachable phone number. To file a complaint against the DC MPD, you can use the independent Office of Police Complaints (OPC) online or by mail/email, or contact the MPD Internal Affairs Division (IAD) directly, with OPC being the primary civilian oversight body for investigations into officer misconduct. Provide details like date, time, location, officer's name/badge, and witnesses, as prompt filing helps preserve evidence, especially for injuries. 

The DC MPD handles complaints through its Internal Affairs Division (IAD) and the independent Office of Police Complaints (OPC); the process involves investigation, interviews, and findings like Sustained, Unfounded, or Exonerated, with complainants notified of the outcome, though discipline details can evolve, and OPC oversees fairness, potentially referring to a hearing examiner for serious misconduct and then to the Chief for action, with complainant input considered. The OPC is responsible for receiving, investigating, adjudicating, and mediating complaints related to police misconduct. They aim to foster community trust and enhance the interaction between the police and the community.

Complaint Handling Receives and investigates misconduct complaints from the public against                                                police officers.
Adjudication                 Reviews cases and determines appropriate outcomes based on investigations.
Mediation                 Offers mediation services to resolve complaints amicably when possible.
Policy 
Recommendations         Issues recommendations for policy reform to the Mayor and the D.C. Council for better practices.

You can file a complaint with MPD's IAD (in-person, mail, email to citizen.complaints@dc.gov) or with the OPC policecomplaints.dc.gov/service/file-a-complaint.

Lieutenant Ayodeji followed up with me next day. I asked if DC MPD would take the nurse and two technicians off the street and out of the medical/science industry. He advised that DC MPD would not investigste the matter. It would be up to your lawyer. Next time it happens, call 911. Imagine my ire! The nurse and two technicians got away with murder.  DC MPD would not investigate because it happened so long ago. My wife, and now caregiver, took away her cell phone. She was comfortable knowing DCMPD would not investigate the matter. Just let it go now.

Let you in on a little joke. I received this e-mail from an organization that wants to help raise $11,00 to help cure my chronic stroke through stem cell therapy:

 Hi Ken - we're a medical fundraising nonprofit, so if it's of interest to you, we could talk to you about starting a medical fundraising campaign for this purpose. 

Do you have some people in your life (friends, family, connections) who may be willing to help out with a fundraising campaign? 

Emily Progin

Content Manager

800-642-8399 (Ext. 38) | helphopelive.org

That's funny! That's rich!

Ignored.

No pullimg of employment records for that night. Leave police work for a lawyer? 

The perception of whether lawyers are lazy can vary greatly depending on individual experiences and viewpoints. Here are some key considerations:

High Workload: Most lawyers face demanding workloads, often working long hours and dealing with high-stress situations. This can lead to burnout rather than laziness.

Specialization: Some areas of law require extensive research and preparation, making short bursts of productivity seem less frequent compared to more intensive legal work.

Inefficiency vs. Laziness: Sometimes, what may be perceived as laziness is more akin to inefficiency or a lack of resources to perform tasks effectively.

Public Misunderstanding: The legal profession is often misunderstood by those outside of it. Tasks like meticulous research or prolonged negotiations may appear leisurely but are critical for successful outcomes.

Variation: Individual lawyers differ widely in work ethic. While some may indeed lack motivation, many are driven and work tirelessly for their clients.

Career Choices: Factors like job satisfaction, specialization, and personal circumstances can influence a lawyer’s perceived laziness.

In summary, while some individuals in the legal profession might not demonstrate a strong work ethic, many lawyers are dedicated professionals who work hard to advocate for their clients.

Ignored. You are not vulnerable just ignored.

I must swallow my reason, grandson, and silently demur.

Nothing to see hear.

"Being ignored is a great privilege" 

Grandson, avenge, don't revenge. 

You will be ignored.



Comments